THE HYPOCRISY OF UNIVERSAL HOUSE OF JUSTICE

THE UHJ ALWAYS PREACHES TOLERANT AND PEACE THEN WHY DO THEY NOT EXTEND THE SAME TOLERANCE AND PEACE TO THEIR OWN WHILE DEMANDING IT OF OTHER RELIGIOUS LEADERS? IS THIS NOT HYPOCRISY?

1-Why send Councillors to threaten professors of history and Middle East studies of 'making statements contrary to the covenant' in the Spring of 1996 and bully them out of the religion?

2-Why the crackdwon on the talis...@indiana.edu list and its participants? Why bully individuals to retract statements of fact, but when they do under duress, they are
sanctioned?

3-Why bully the editors of Dialogue magazine to close it down and accuse them of negative campaiging and lying for an article entitled *A Modest Proposal* which had gone through the process of pre-publication review by the NSA itself and then accuse these editors of being covenant breakers for following the NSA's own rules and guidelines on the floor of National Convention in 1988?

4-Why threaten people believing in freedom of conscience and freedom to express one's opinion?

5-Why expell Michael McKenney for merely believing that women should serve on the UHJ?

6-Why expell Alison Marshall for believing that the UHJ is not infallible?

7-Why sanction those Iranian Baha'is for leaving Iran via Mehrabad airport because they were required to fill out a form stating their religion?

8-Why spy on individuals such as myself and violate their fundamental right to privacy a year after I had formally left the religion?

9-Why write libellous and slanderous letters about people and then denounce them as enemies in their national publications?

10-Why attempt to have people shunned and split up families because they believe differently from the official line? And so on and so forth, ad nauseum!

Given the current UHJ's own track record with its own dissidents, it is the last one who can preach about peace and tolerance towards others! They ought to start with themselves first before telling others what to do?